A corpus-assisted genre analysis of the Tunisian Lecture Corpus: An exploratory study

Keywords: academic lectures, corpus, genre analysis, Tunisia, exploratory studies, Systemic Functional Linguistics, English for Specific Purposes

Abstract

Multimodal, specialized corpora of academic lectures represent authentic classroom data that practitioners can draw on to design academic listening resources that would help students attend lectures. These corpora can also act as reflective practice corpora for teacher training or professional development programs with the objective of raising awareness of lecturing practices. Despite their contribution in shaping the type and quality of the learning that takes place in classrooms, multimodal lecture corpora are scarce, particularly in the Arab world. This paper addresses this research gap by designing and collecting a corpus of academic lectures delivered in English in Tunisia. The corpus was explored using a Systemic Functional Linguistics and English for Specific Purposes integrated genre analysis framework. A three-layered model of analysis was used to manually code various rhetorical functions as well as their realizations. Major findings include the pervasiveness of metadiscursive functions when compared to discourse functions, the identification of context-specific metadiscursive strategies, and the absence of verbal or non-verbal signaling of some rhetorical functions. Implications relate to the necessity of compiling and/or using lecture corpora that are multimodal, the value of adopting function-first approaches to explore these, particularly in non-native contexts, and the design of professional development programs and learning materials that would better account for local academic needs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdesslem, Habib. 1987. An Analysis of Foreign Language Lesson Discourse: With special Reference to the Teaching of English in Tunisian Secondary Schools. Sheffield: The University of Sheffield thesis.

Abdesslem, Habib and Hassan Costello. 2018. Introductions in locally published research articles in linguistics: Towards a syntagmatics of moves. Arab Journal of Applied Linguistics 3/1: 5–46.

Ädel, Annelie. 2006. Metadiscourse in L1 and L2 English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Alsop, Siân and Hilary Nesi. 2014. The pragmatic annotation of a corpus of academic lectures. LREC: 1560–1563.

Ballier, Nicolas and Philippe Martin. 2015. Speech annotation of learner corpora. In Sylviane Granger, Gaëtanelle Gilquin and Fanny Meunier eds., 107–134.

Bhatia, Vijay K. 2001. Analyzing genre: Some conceptual issues. In Marting Hewings ed. Academic Writing in Context: Implications and Application. Birmingham: University of Birmingham Press, 79–92.

Bhatia, Vijay K. 2002. A generic view of academic discourse. In John Flowerdew ed., 21–39.

Biber, Douglas, Ulla Connor and Thomas A. Upton. 2007. Discourse on the Move: Using Corpus Analysis to Describe Discourse Structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Bouziri, Basma. 2019. A Corpus-assisted Genre Analysis of the Tunisian Lecture Corpus: Focus on Metadiscourse. Louvain La Neuve: Université Catholique de Louvain thesis.

Bouziri, Basma (Forthcoming). Topic signaling in the Tunisian Lecture Corpus. ESP Today 8/2: 2–24.

Callies, Marcus. 2015. Learner corpus methodology. In Sylviane Granger, Gaëtanelle Gilquin and Fanny Meunier eds., 35–56.

Camiciottoli, Belinda. 2008. Interaction in academic lectures vs. written text materials: The case of questions. Journal of Pragmatics 40/7: 1216–1231.

Cheng, Stephanie W. 2012. “That’s it for today:” Academic lecture closings and the impact of class size. English for Specific Purposes 31/4: 234–248.

Crismore, Avon, Raija Markkanen and Margaret S. Steffensen. 1993. Metadiscourse in persuasive writing: A study of texts written by American and Finnish university students. Written Communication 10/1: 39–71.

Deroey, Katrin L. B. and Miriam Taverniers. 2011. A corpus-based study of lecture functions. Moderna Språk 2: 1–22.

Deroey, Katrin L. B. 2017. How representative are EAP listening books of real lectures? In Jenny Kemp ed. 2015 BALEAP Conference Proceedings: EAP in a rapidly Changing Landscape: Issues, Challenges and Solutions. Reading: Garnet Publishing.

Dudley-Evans, Tony. 1994. Variations in the discourse patterns favored by different disciplines and their pedagogical implications. In John Flowerdew ed., 146–158.

Duszak, Anna. 1994. Academic discourse and intellectual styles. Journal of Pragmatics 21/3: 291–313.

Flowerdew, John. 1992. Definitions in science lectures. Applied Linguistics 13/2: 202–221.

Flowerdew, John ed. 1994. Academic Listening: Research Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Flowerdew, John ed. 2002. Academic Discouse. London: Longman.

Flowerdew, John. 2002. Genre in the classroom: A linguistic approach. In Anne Johns ed. Genre in the Classroom: Multiple Perspectives. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 91–120.

Flowerdew, Lynn. 2004. The argument for using English specialized corpora to understand academic and professional language. In Ulla Connor and Thomas A. Upton eds. Discourse in the Professions: Perspectives from Corpus Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 11–33.

Flowerdew, John. 2013. Discourse in English Language Education. London: Routledge.

Goffman, Erving. 1981. Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Granger, Sylviane, Gaëtanelle Gilquin and Fanny Meunier eds. 2015. The Cambridge Handbook of Learner Corpus Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gregory, Michael. 2002. Phasal analysis within communication linguistics. In Michael Cummings, Peter Fries, David Lockwood and William Spruiell eds. Relations and Functions within and around Language. London: Continuum, 316–345.

Hyland, Ken. 2002. Activity and evaluation: Reporting practices in academic writing. In John Flowerdew ed., 115–130.

Hyon, Sunny. 1996. Genre in three traditions: Implications for ESL. TESOL Quarterly 30/4: 693–722.

Jackson, Jane and Linda Bilton. 1994. Stylistic variations in science lectures: Teaching vocabulary. English for Specific Purposes 13/1: 61–80.

Kwan, Becky S. C. 2006. The schematic structure of literature reviews in doctoral theses of applied linguistics. English for Specific Purposes 25/1: 30–55.

Lee, Joseph. 2009. Size matters: An exploratory comparison of small and large-class university lecture introductions. English for Specific Purposes 28/1: 42–57.

Lessard-Clouston, Michael. 2009. Definitions in theology lectures: Implications for vocabulary learning. The Asian ESP Journal 5/1: 7–22.

Luukka, Miina. Riitta. 1994. Metadiscourse in academic texts. In Britt-Louise Gunnarson, Per Linell and Bengt Nordberg eds. Text and Talk in Professional Contexts. Uppsala: The Swedish Association of Applied Linguistics.

Martín del Pozo, María Ángeles. 2017. Training teachers for English Medium Instruction: Lessons from research on second language listening comprehension. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas 12/1: 55–63.

Molino, Alessandra. 2018. ʻWhat I’m speaking is almost English…ʼ: A corpus-based study of metadiscourse in English Medium Lectures at an Italian university. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice 18/4: 935–956.

Nesi, Hilary. 2008. Corpora and EAP. In LSP: Interfacing Language with other Realms: Proceedings of the 6th Languages for Specific Purposes International Seminar. Johor Bahru: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/al/research/collections/bawe/papers/corpora_and_eap.pdf

O’Donnell, Mike. 2017. UAM CorpusTool. Madrid: Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.

Palmer-Silveira, Juan Carlos. 2004. Delivery strategies in classroom lectures: Organising the message. In Pilar Garcés, Reyes Gómez, Lucía Fernández and Manuel Padilla eds. Current Trends in Intercultural, Cognitive and Social Pragmatics. Sevilla: Editorial Kronos, 97–115.

Partington, Alan. 2004. Corpus-assisted discourse studies. In Alan Partington, John Morley and Louann Haarman eds. Corpora and Discourse. Berlin: Peter Lang, 9–18.

Swales, John. 1990. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Swales, John. 2004. Research Genres: Explorations and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Thompson, Susan. 1994. Frameworks and contexts: A genre-based approach to analyzing lecture introductions. English for Specific Purposes 13/2: 171–186.

Thompson, Susan. 2003. Text-structuring metadiscourse, intonation and the signaling of organization in academic lectures. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2/1: 5–20.

Tognini-Bonelli, Elena. 2001. Corpus Linguistics at Work. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Touati, Walid. 2004. Native vs. Non-native Treatment of Oral Errors in an EFL Context. Tunisia: Institut Supérieur des Langues de Tunis dissertation.

Vande Kopple, William J. 1985. Some exploratory discourse on metadiscourse. College Composition and Communication 36/1: 82–93.

Wu, Shuxuan. 2013. Discourse structure and listening comprehension of English academic lectures. Theory and Practice in Language Studies 3/9: 1705–1709.

Yaakob, Salmah. 2013. A Genre Analysis and Corpus-based Study of University Lecture Introductions. Birmingham: The University of Birmingham dissertation.

Yin, Bin. 2016. An exploratory genre analysis of three graduate degree research proposals in applied linguistics. Functional Linguistics 3/7: 1–28

Young, Lynn. 1990. Language as Behavior, Language as Code: A Study of Academic English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Young, Lynn. 1994. University lectures-macro-structure and micro-features. In John Flowerdew ed., 169–178.

Published
2020-10-25
How to Cite
Bouziri, B. (2020). A corpus-assisted genre analysis of the Tunisian Lecture Corpus: An exploratory study. Research in Corpus Linguistics, 8(2), 103-132. https://doi.org/10.32714/ricl.08.02.06