Review of Yáñez-Bouza, Nuria, Emma Moore, Linda Van Bergen and Willem B. Hollmann eds. 2019. Categories, Constructions, and Change in English Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 978-1-108-41956-7. htpps:// doi.org/10.1017/9781108303576

Keywords: categories, constructions, syntactic change

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aarts, Bas. 2007. Syntactic Gradience: The Nature of Grammatical Indeterminacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Allen, Cynthia L. 1995. Case Marking and Reanalysis: Grammatical Relations from Old to Early Modern English. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Bachmann, Ingo. 2013. Has go-V ousted go-and-V? A study of the diachronic development of both constructions in American English. In Hilde Hasselgård, Jarle Ebeling and Signe Oksefjell Ebeling eds. Corpus Perspectives on Patterns of Lexis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 91–112.

Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad and Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow, Essex: Pearson Education Limited.

Börjars, Kersti and Nigel Vincent. 2017. Lexical-Functional Grammar. In Adam Ledgeway and Ian Roberts eds. The Cambridge Handbook of Historical Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 642–663.

Bresnan, Joan. 2007. Is syntactic knowledge probabilistic? Experiments with the English dative alternation. In Sam Featherston and Wolfgang Sternefeld eds. Roots: Linguistics in Search of Its Evidential Base. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 75–96.

Brinton, Laurel J. 2008. The Comment Clause in English: Syntactic Origins and Pragmatic Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Brinton, Laurel J. 2014. If you choose/like/prefer/want/wish: The origin of metalinguistic and politeness functions. In Marianne Hundt ed. Late Modern English Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 271–290.

Brinton, Laurel J. 2017. The Evolution of Pragmatic Markers in English. Pathways of Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins and William Pagliuca. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.

Castro-Chao, Noelia. 2019. Changes in argument structure in Early Modern English with special reference to verbs of desire: A case study of lust. Research in Corpus Linguistics 7: 129–154.

Crisma, Paola. 2011. The emergence of the definite article in English: A contact-induced change? In Petra Sleeman and Harry Perridon eds. The Noun Phrase in Romance and Germanic: Structure, Variation, and Change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 175–192.

Davies, Mark. 2017. Early English Books Online. Part of the SAMUELS project. https: //www.english-corpora.org/eebo/

De Smet, Hendrik. 2009. Analysing reanalysis. Lingua 119/11: 1728–1755.

De Smet, Hendrik. 2013. Spreading Patterns. Diffusional Change in the English System of Complementation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Denison, David. 1990. The Old English impersonals revived. In Sylvia Adamson, Vivien A. Law, Nigel Vincent and Susan Wright eds. Papers from the 5th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics: Cambridge, 6–9 April 1987. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 111–140.

Denison, David. 1993. English Historical Syntax: Verbal Constructions. London: Longman.

Denison, David and Alison Cort. 2010. Better as a verb. In Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte and Hubert Cuyckens eds. Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization. Berlin: De Gruyter, 349–383.

Dreschler, Gea. 2015. Passives and the Loss of Verb Second: A Study of Syntactic and Information-Structural Factors. Utrecht: LOT Publications.

Elmer, Willy. 1981. Diachronic Grammar: The History of Old and Middle English Subjectless Constructions. Tübingen: Niemeyer.

Fanego, Teresa. 2016. Shakespeare’s grammar. In Bruce R. Smith ed. The Cambridge Guide to the Worlds of Shakespeare, Volume 1: Shakespeare’s World 1500–1660. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 184–191.

Fischer, Olga. 1988. The rise of the for NP to V construction: An explanation. In Graham Nixon and Honey eds. An Historic Tongue: Studies in English Linguistics in Memory of Barbara Strang. London: Routledge, 67–88.

Fischer, Olga. 1994. The development of quasi-auxiliaries in English and changes in word order. Neophilologus 78/1: 137–164.

Fischer, Olga. 2015. The influence of the grammatical system and analogy in processes of language change: The case of the auxiliation of have-to once again. In Fabienne Toupin and Brian Lowrey eds. Studies in Linguistic Variation and Change: From Old to Middle English. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 120–150.

Flach, Susanne. 2015. Let’s go look at usage: A constructional approach to formal constraints on go-VERB. In Peter Uhrig and Thomas Herbst eds. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 231–252.

Hoffmann, Thomas. 2018. Review of Barðdal, Jóhanna, Elena Smirnova, Lotte Sommerer and Spike Gildea eds. 2015. Diachronic Construction Grammar. Constructions and Frames 10/1: 106–114.

Huddleston, Rodney and Geoffrey K. Pullum et al. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Krug, Manfred. 2000. Emerging English Modals. A Corpus-based Study of Grammaticalization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Lastres-López, Cristina. 2020a. Beyond conditionality: On the pragmaticalization of interpersonal if-constructions in English conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 157: 68–83.

Lastres-López, Cristina. 2020b. Subordination and insubordination in Contemporary Spoken English: If-clauses as a case in point. English Today 36/2: 48–52.

Light, Caitlin and Joel Wallenberg. 2015. The expression of impersonals in Middle English. English Language and Linguistics 19/2: 227–245.

Los, Bettelou. 2005. The Rise of the To-Infinitive. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Loureiro-Porto, Lucía. 2009. The Semantic Predecessors of Need in the History of English (c750–1710). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Loureiro-Porto, Lucía. 2010. Verbo-nominal constructions of necessity with þearf n. and need n.: Competition and grammaticalization from OE to eModE. English Language and Linguistics 14/3: 373–397.

Lyons, Christopher. 1986. The syntax of English genitive constructions. Journal of Linguistics 22/1: 123–143.

Mair, Christian. 1997. Parallel corpora: A real-time approach to the study of language change in progress. In Magnus Ljung ed. Corpus-Based Studies in English. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 195–209.

Miura, Ayumi. 2015. Middle English Verbs of Emotion and Impersonal Constructions: Verb Meaning and Syntax in Diachrony. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Möhlig-Falke, Ruth. 2012. The Early English Impersonal Construction: An Analysis of Verbal and Constructional Meaning. New York: Oxford University Press.

Payne, John and Eva Berlage. 2014. Genitive variation: The niche role of the oblique genitive. English Language and Linguistics 18/2: 331–360.

Payne, John and Rodney Huddleston. 2002. Nouns and noun phrases. In Rodney Huddleston and Geoffrey K. Pullum et al. eds. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 323–523.

Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech and Jan Svartvik. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.

Reid, Dan. 2009. The great Festschrift makeover. Addenda & Errata. http://addenda-errata.ivpress.com/2009/03/the_great_festschrift_makeover.php (11 March, 2009.)

Rosenbach, Anette. 2002. Genitive Variation in English: Conceptual Factors in Synchronic and Diachronic Studies. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Ross, Daniel. 2018. Small corpora and low-frequency phenomena: Try and beyond contemporary, standard English. Corpus 18: 1–40.

Schneider, Edgar W. 2007. Postcolonial English: Varieties around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sommerer, Lotte. 2015. The influence of constructions in grammaticalization. Revisiting category emergence and the development of the definite article in English. In Barðdal, Jóhanna, Elena Smirnova, Lotte Sommerer and Spike Gildea eds. Diachronic Construction Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 107–137.

Sommerer, Lotte. 2018. Article Emergence in Old English. A Constructionalist Perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Graeme Trousdale. 2013. Constructionalization and Constructional Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

van der Gaaf, Willem. 1904. The Transition from the Impersonal to the Personal Construction in Middle English. Heidelberg: C. Winter.

van gelderen, Elly. 2007. The definiteness cycle in Germanic. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 19/4: 275–308.

Van linden, An. 2015. Comparative modals: (Dis)similar diachronic tendencies. Functions of Language 22/2: 192–231.

Van de Velde, Freek. 2014. Degeneracy: The maintenance of constructional networks. In Ronny Boogaert, Timothy Colleman and Gijsbert Rutten eds. Extending the Scope of Construction Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 141–179.

Warner, Anthony. 1982. Complementation in Middle English and the Methodology of Historical Syntax. A Study of the Wyclifite Sermons. London: Croom Helm.

Watanabe, Akira. 2009. A parametric shift in the D-system in Early Middle English: Relativization, articles, adjectival inflexion, and indeterminates. In Paola Crisma and Giuseppe Longobardi eds. Historical Syntax and Linguistic Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 358–374.

Published
2020-11-05
How to Cite
Fanego, T. (2020). Review of Yáñez-Bouza, Nuria, Emma Moore, Linda Van Bergen and Willem B. Hollmann eds. 2019. Categories, Constructions, and Change in English Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 978-1-108-41956-7. htpps:// doi.org/10.1017/9781108303576. Research in Corpus Linguistics, 8(2), 159-175. https://doi.org/10.32714/ricl.08.02.08