Linguistic democratization in HKE across registers: The effects of prescriptivism
Abstract
The second half or the twentieth century witnessed the emergence and expansion of linguistic changes associated to a number of processes related to changes in socio-cultural norms, such as colloquialization, informalization and democratization. This paper focuses on the latter, a phenomenon that has been claimed to be responsible for several ongoing changes in inner-circle varieties of English, but is rather unexplored in outer-circle varieties. The paper explores Hong Kong English and studies two linguistic sets of markers that include items that represent the (old) undemocratic alternative and the (new) democratic option, namely modal must vs. semi-modals have (got) to, need (to) and want to, and epicene pronouns including undemocratic generic he, on the one hand, and democratic singular they and conjoined he or she, on the other. Using the Hong Kong component of the International Corpus of English, and adopting a register approach, the paper reaches conclusions regarding the role played by prescriptivism in the diffusion of democratic items.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Anderwald, Lieselotte. 2012. Variable past-tense forms in nineteenth-century American English: Linking normative grammars and language change. American Speech 87/3: 257–293.
Baker, Paul. 2010. Sociolinguistics and Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Baker, Paul. 2014. Using Corpora to Analyze Gender. London: Bloomsbury.
Baker, Paul. 2017. American and British English: Divided by a Common Language? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Balhorn, Mark. 2004. The rise of epicene they. Journal of English Linguistics 32/2: 79–104.
Balhorn, Mark. 2009. The epicene pronoun in contemporary newspaper prose. American Speech 84/4: 391–413.
Biber, Douglas. 1988. Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Biber, Douglas and Susan Conrad. 2009. Register, Genre, and Style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Biber, Douglas and Bethany Gray. 2016. Grammatical Complexity in Academic English. Linguistic Change in Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Greoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad and Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.
Bodine, Ann. 1975. Androcentrism in prescriptive grammar: Singular ‘they’, sex-indefinite ‘he’, and ‘he or she’. Language in Society 4/2: 129–146.
Bolton, Kingsley ed. 2000a. Hong Kong English: Autonomy and Creativity. Special Issue of World Englishes 19/3.
Bolton, Kingsley. 2000b. The sociolinguistics of Hong Kong and the space for Hong Kong English. World Englishes 19/3: 265–285.
Bolton, Kingsley. 2003. Chinese Englishes. A Sociolinguistic History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. London: Routledge.
Cameron, Deborah. 1995. Verbal Hygiene. London: Routledge.
Collins, Peter. 2009. Modals and quasi-modals in world Englishes. World Englishes 28/3: 281–292.
Collins, Peter. 2013. Grammatical colloquialism and the English quasi-modals: A comparative study. In Juana I. Marín-Arrese et al. eds., 155–169.
Curzan, Anne. 2014. Fixing English. Prescriptivism and Language History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Eckert, Penelope. 2012. Three waves of variation study: The emergence of meaning in the study of sociolinguistic variation. Annual Review of Anthropology 41: 87–100.
Fairclough, Norman. 1992. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Farrelly, Michael and Elena Seoane. 2012. Democratisation. In Terttu Nevalainen and Elizabeth C. Traugott eds. The Oxford Handbook of the History of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 392–401.
Greenbaum, Sidney ed. 1996. Comparing English Worldwide: ICE. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Hansen, Beke. 2018. A Study of Variation and Change in the Modal Systems of World Englishes. Leiden: Brill.
Hiltunen, Turo and Lucía Loureiro-Porto. 2020. Democratization of Englishes: Synchronic and diachronic approaches. Language Sciences 79, May 2020, Article 101275.
Huddleston, Rodney and Geoffrey K. Pullum et al. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hundt, Marianne and Christian Mair. 1999. “Agile” and “uptight” genres: The corpus-based approach to language change in progress. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 4/2: 221–242.
Hundt, Marianne. 2015. World Englishes. In Douglas Biber and Randi Reppen eds. The Cambridge Handbook of English Corpus Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 381–400.
Kirby, John. 1746. A New English Grammar. Menston, England: Scolar Press Facsimile.
Kotze, Haidee and Bertus van Rooy. 2020. Democratisation in the South African parliamentary Hansard? A study of change in modal auxiliaries. Language Sciences 79, May 2020, Article 101264.
Kranich, Svenja, Elisabeth Hampel and Hanna Bruns. 2020. Changes in the modal domain in different varieties of English as potential effects of democratization. Language Sciences 79, May 2020, Article 101271.
Krug, Manfred G. 2000. Emerging English Modals: A Corpus-based Study of Grammaticalization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Lakoff, Robin. 1975. Language and Woman’s Place. New York: Harper & Row.
LaScotte, Darren K. 2016. Singular they: An empirical study of generic pronoun use. American Speech 91/1: 62–80.
Leech, Geoffrey. 2011. The modals are declining. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 16/4: 547–564.
Leech, Geoffrey. 2013. Where have all the modals gone? An essay on the declining frequency of core modal auxiliaries in recent standard English. In Juana I. Marín-Arrese et al. eds., 95–115.
Leech, Geoffrey. 2014. Growth and decline: How grammar has been changing in recent English. In Nikolaos Lavidas, Thomaï Alexiou and Areti-Maria Sougari eds. Major Trends in Theoretical and Applied Linguistics. Volume 1. London: Versita, 47–65.
Leech, Geoffrey, Marianne Hundt, Christian Mair and Nicholas Smith. 2009. Change in Contemporary English: A Grammatical Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Loureiro-Porto, Lucía. 2016. (Semi-)modals of necessity in Hong Kong and Indian Englishes. In Elena Seoane and Cristina Suárez-Gómez eds. World Englishes: New Theoretical and Methodological Considerations. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 143–172.
Loureiro-Porto, Lucía. 2019. Grammaticalization of semi-modals of necessity in Asian Englishes. English World-Wide 40/2: 115–142.
Loureiro-Porto, Lucía. 2020. (Un)democratic epicene pronouns in Asian Englishes: A register approach. Journal of English Linguistics 48/3: 282–313.
Loureiro-Porto, Lucía and Turo Hiltunen. 2020. Democratization and gender-neutrality in English(es). Journal of English Linguistics 48/3: 215–232.
Mair, Christian. 2006. Twentieth-century English: History, Variation and Standardization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mair, Christian. 2015. Cross-variety diachronic drifts and ephemeral regional contrasts. An analysis of modality in the extended Brown family of corpora and what it can tell us about the New Englishes. In Peter Collins ed. Grammatical Change in English World-Wide. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 119–146.
Marín-Arrese, Juana I. Marta Carretero, Jorge Arús Hita and Johan van der Auwera eds. 2013. English Modality. Core, Periphery and Evidentiality. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
Metcalf, Allan. 2011. OK. The Improbable Story of America’s Greatest Word. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Meyerhoff, Miriam. 2014. Variation and gender. In Susan Ehrlich, Miriam Meyerhoff and Janet Holmes eds. The Handbook of Language, Gender, and Sexuality (second edition). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 87–102.
Meyers, Miriam W. 1993. Forms of they with singular noun phrase antecedents: Evidence from current educated English usage. Word 44/2: 181–192.
Milroy, James and Lesley Milroy. 1985. Authority in Language. Investigating Standard English. London: Routledge.
Myhill, John. 1995. Change and continuity in the functions of the American English modals. Linguistics 33/2: 157–211.
Nelson, Gerald. 2009. World Englishes and corpora studies. In Braj B. Kachru, Yamnuna Kachru and Cecil L. Nelson eds. The Handbook of World Englishes. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 733–750.
Nokkonen, Soili. 2006. The semantic variation of NEED TO in four recent British English corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 11/1: 29–71.
Online Writing Lab at Purdue University. https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/purdue_owl.html (24 September, 2020.)
Oxford English Dictionary Online. https://www.oed.com
Paterson, Laura Louise. 2011. Epicene pronouns in UK national newspapers: A diachronic study. ICAME Journal 35: 171–184.
Paterson, Laura Louise. 2014. British Pronoun Use, Prescription, and Processing. Linguistic and Social Influences Affecting ‘They’ and ‘He’. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Paterson, Laura Louise. 2020. Non-sexist language policy and the rise (and fall?) of combined pronouns in British and American written English. Journal of English Linguistics 48/3: 258–281.
Pauwels, Anne. 2001. Non-sexist language reform and generic pronouns in Australian English. English World-Wide 22/1: 105–119.
Quirk, Randolph and Sidney Greenbaum. 1973. A University Grammar of English. London. Longman.
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech and Jan Svartvik. 1972. A Grammar of Contemporary English. London: Longman.
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech and Jan Svartvik. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
Rossouw, Ronel and Bertus van Rooy. 2012. Diachronic changes in modality in South African English. English World-Wide 33/1: 1–26.
Schneider, Edgar W. 2007. Postcolonial English: Varieties around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Seoane, Elena and Christopher Williams. 2006. Changing the rules: A comparison of recent trends in English in academic scientific discourse and prescriptive legal discourse. In Marina Dossena and Irma Taavitsainen eds. Diachronic Perspectives on Domain-specific English. Bern: Peter Lang, 255–276.
Setter, Jane, Cathy S. P. Wong and Brian H. S. Chang. 2010. Hong Kong English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Sinclair, John. 1990. Collins Cobuild English Grammar. London: Harper Collins.
Silveira, Jeanette. 1980. Generic masculine words and thinking. Women Studies International Quarterly 3: 165–178.
Smith, Nicholas. 2003. Changes in the modals and semi-modals of strong obligation and epistemic necessity in recent British English. In Roberta Facchinetti, Manfred Krug and Frank Robert Palmer eds. Modality in Contemporary English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 241–266.
Swan, Michael. 1986. Basic English Usage. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
Tannen, Deborah. 1990. You just don’t Understand: Women and Men in Conversation. London: Virago.
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid. 1982. Double negation and eighteenth-century English grammars. Neophilologus 66/2: 278–285.
Tsui, Amy B. M. and David Bunton. 2002. The discourse and attitudes of English language teachers in Hong Kong. In Kingsley Bolton ed. Hong Kong English. Autonomy and Creativity. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 55–77.
Van der Auwera, Johan, Dirk Noël and Astrid de Wit. 2012. The diverging need (to)’s of Asian Englishes. In Marianne Hundt and Ulrike Gut eds. Mapping Unity and Diversity World-wide: Corpus-Based Studies of New Englishes. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 54–75.
Wasserman, Ronel and Bertus van Rooy. 2014. The development of modals of obligation and necessity in White South African English through contact with Afrikaans. Journal of English Linguistics 42/1: 31–50.
Yáñez-Bouza, Nuria. 2008. Preposition stranding in the eighteenth century: Something to talk about. In Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade ed. Grammars, Grammarians and Grammar-writing in Eighteenth-century England. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 251–277.
Zuber, Shanon and Ann M. Reed. 1993. The politics of grammar handbooks: Generic ‘he’ and singular ‘they’. College English 55: 515–530.
Copyright (c) 2021 Research in Corpus Linguistics
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
