Review of Gandón-Chapela, Evelyn. 2020. On Invisible Language in Modern English: A Corpus-based Approach to Ellipsis. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
ISBN: 978-1-350-06451-5. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.5040/9781350064546
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32714/ricl.11.01.07Keywords:
ellipsis, invisible language, contemporary EnglishDownloads
References
Biber, Douglas. 1988. Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Biber, Douglas and Edward Finegan. 1997. Diachronic relations among speech-based and written registers in English. In Terttu Nevalainen and Leena Kahlas-Tarkka eds. To Explain the Present: Studies in the Changing English Language in Honour of Matti Rissanen. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique de Helsinki, 253–275.
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad and Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman Grammar of Written and Spoken English. London: Longman.
Culpeper, Jonathan and Merja Kytö. 2010. Early Modern English Dialogues: Spoken Interaction as Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gergel, Remus. 2009. Modality and Ellipsis: Diachronic and Synchronic Evidence. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Huddleston, Rodney and Geoffrey K. Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kroch, Anthony, Beatrice Santorini and Ariel Diertani. 2016. The Penn Parsed Corpus of Modern British English (PPCMBE2). Department of Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania. https://www.ling.upenn.edu/ppche/ppche-release-2016/PPCMBE2-RELEASE-1
Nykiel, Joanna. 2006. Ellipsis in Shakespeare’s Syntax. Silesia, Poland: University of Silesia PhD dissertation.
Nykiel, Joanna. 2015. Constraints on the ellipsis alternation: A view from the history of English. Language Variation and Change 27: 1–8.
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech and Jan Svartvik. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
Warner, Anthony R. 1993. English Auxiliaries: Structure and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Warner, Anthony R. 1997. Extending the paradigm: An interpretation of the historical development of auxiliary sequences in English. English Studies 78/2: 162–189.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Submission of your paper to this journal implies that the paper is not under submission for publication elsewhere. Material which has been previously copyrighted, published, or accepted for publication will not be considered for publication in this journal. Submission of a manuscript is interpreted as a statement of certification that no part of the manuscript is copyrighted by any other publisher nor is under review by any other formal publication. By submitting your manuscript to us, you agree on these copyright guidelines. It is your responsibility to ensure that your manuscript does not cause any copyright infringements, defamation, and other problems.
Submitted papers are assumed to contain no proprietary material unprotected by patent or patent application; responsibility for technical content and for protection of proprietary material rests solely with the author(s) and their organizations and is not the responsibility of the journal or its editorial staff. The main author is responsible for ensuring that the article has been seen and approved by all the other authors. It is the responsibility of the author to obtain all necessary copyright release permissions for the use of any copyrighted materials in the manuscript prior to the submission.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under the BY Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
Article submission implies author agreement with this policy.
