“You have done a great job, but I would make some changes.” Concession and politeness in asynchronous online discussion forums
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32714/ricl.13.01.06Keywords:
computer mediated communication, politeness, concessive, mitigation, argumentativeAbstract
The aim of this study is to provide a preliminary characterisation of concessives in asynchronous online discussion forums and to explore how learners participating in the discussions use concession in combination with other politeness strategies in a collaborative pedagogical context. For this purpose, a corpus of 165 concessive clauses headed by but (henceforth, butCs) was extracted from the English component of the Santiago University Corpus of Discussions in Academic Contexts (SUNCODAC). First, we explored the co-occurrence of butCs with different lexical features (first and second-person pronouns and adjectives, hedges, boosters and positive and negative sentiment words) which have been reported to be important for this categorisation (Hyland 2005; Musi et al. 2018). Then, variations in the frequency of use of these linguistic features were investigated using the Log Likelihood test in relation to different contextual factors: a) message section, b) course period, and c) gender. The results of the quantitative analyses indicate that the typical butC co-occurs with a set of lexical features whose distribution is clearly determined by the discourse function of the two concessive propositions, and by the part of the message in which it appears. Furthermore, the fact that the frequency of all features seems to decrease over time seems to point to an evolution from a more tentative to a more confident tone in posts. The results also confirm the existence of gender-related differences.
Downloads
References
Barth, Dagmar. 2000. That’s true, although not really, but still: Expressing concession in spoken English. In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen and Bernd Kortmann eds. Cause-Condition-Concession-Contrast: Cognitive and Discourse Perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 411–437.
Biber, Douglas. 1988. Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad and Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.
Brown, Penelope and Steven C. Levinson. 1978. Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In Esther N. Goody ed. Questions and Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 56–289.
Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brysbaert, Jorina and Karen Lahousse. 2019. Computer-mediated versus non-computer-mediated corpora of informal French: Differences in politeness and intensification in the expression of contrast by au contraire. In Julien Longhi and Claudia Marinica eds. Proceedings of the 7th Conference on CMC and Social Media Corpora for the Humanities. Cergy-Pontoise: The Institute Of Digital Humanities of Cergy-Pontoise University, 48–52.
Cal-Varela, Mario and Francisco Javier Fernández-Polo. 2019. Preparing the ground for critical feedback in online discussions: A look at mitigation strategies. In Julien Longhi and Claudia Marinica eds. CMC Corpora through the Prism of Digital Humanities. Paris: L’Harmattan, 15–34.
Cal-Varela, Mario and Francisco Javier Fernández-Polo. 2020. SUNCODAC: A corpus of online forums in higher education. Nexus-AEDEAN 2: 44–52.
Cameron, Deborah. 1992. ‘Not gender difference but the difference gender makes’: Explanation in research on sex and language. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 1992/92: 13-26.
Carlo, Jessica Luo and Youngjin Yoo. 2007. “How may I help you?” Politeness in computer-mediated and face-to-face library reference transactions. Information and Organization 17/4: 193–231.
Coates, Jennifer. 2004. Women, Men and Language: A Sociolinguistic Account of Gender Differences in Language. New York: Routledge.
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth and Sandra Thompson. 2000. Concessive patterns in conversation. In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen and Bernd Kortmann eds. Cause, Concession, Contrast: Cognitive and Discourse Perspectives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 381–410.
Crawford, Mary. 1995. Talking Difference: On Gender and Language. London: Sage.
Deris, Farhana Diana, Rachel Tan Hooi Koon and Abdul Rahim Salam. 2015. Virtual Communities in an Online English language learning forum. International Education Studies 8/12: 79–87.
Doval-Suárez, Susana M. and Elsa González-Álvarez. 2021. A Comparison of NS and NNS use of Concessive Markers in Computer- and Non-computer Mediated Discourse. Paper presented at the 9th International Contrastive Linguistics Conference, University of Genoa (Italy), 20–21 May 2021.
Fernández-Polo, Francisco Javier and Mario Cal-Varela. 2017. A description of asynchronous online discussions in higher education. In Chelo Vargas-Sierra ed. Professional and Academic Discourse: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Epic Series in Language and Linguistics 2. Alicante: AESLA, 256–264.
Fernández-Polo, Francisco Javier and Mario Cal-Varela. 2018. A structural analysis of student online forum discussions. In Francisco Javier Díaz Pérez and María Águeda Moreno Moreno eds. Looking at the Crossroads: Training, Accreditation and Context of Use. Jaén: University of Jaén, 189–200.
Goffman, Erving. 1967. Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Interaction. Chicago: Aldine.
Gómez-González, María de los Ángeles. 2017. Concession in evaluative discourse: The semantics, pragmatics and discourse effects of ‘but’ and ‘although’. In Ruth Breeze and Inés Olza eds. Evaluation in Media Discourse: Rhetoric and Intercultural Pragmatics. Bern and New York: Peter Lang, 47–80.
Graddol, David and Joan Swan. 1989. Gender voices. Cambridge: Basil Blackwell.
Grote, Brigitte, Nils Lenke and Manfed Stede. 1997. Ma(r)king concessions in English and German. Discourse Processes 24/1: 87–117.
Guiller, Jane and Alan Durndell. 2006. ‘I totally agree with you’: Gender interactions in educational online discussion groups. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 22: 368–381.
Hall, Kira. 1996. Cyberfeminism. In Susan Herring ed. Computer-Mediated Communication: Linguistic, Social and Cross-Cultural Perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 147–170.
Harrison, Sandra. 2000. Maintaining the virtual community: Use of politeness strategies in an email discussion group. In Lyn Pemberton and Simon Shurville eds. Words on the Web. Exeter: Intellect Ltd., 69–79.
Herring, Susan C. 1994. Politeness in computer culture: Why women thank and men flame. In Mary Bucholtz ed. Cultural Performances: Proceedings of the Third Berkeley Women and Language Conference. Berkely: Berkeley Women and Language Group, 278–294.
Herring, Susan C. 1996. Posting in a different voice: Gender and ethics in computer-mediated communication. In Charles Ess ed. Philosophical Perspectives on Computer-Mediated Communication. Albany: SUNY Press, 115–145.
Herring, Susan C. 2000. Gender differences in CMC: Findings and implications. Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility Journal 18/1: 1–9.
Herring, Susan C. 2023. Grammar and electronic communication. In Carol A. Chapelle ed. The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. New York: Wiley-Blackwell, 1–9.
Herring, Susan C. and Sharon Stoerger. 2014. Gender and (A)nonimity in computer- mediated communication. In Susan Ehrlich, Miriam Meyerhoff and Janet Holmes eds. The Handbook of Language, Gender, and Sexuality. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell, 567–586.
Hinkel, Eli. 2005. Hedging, inflating, and persuading. Applied Language Learning 15/1–2: 29–53.
Holmes, Janet. 1982. Expressing doubt and certainty in English. RELC Journal 13/2: 9–28.
Hu, Minqing and Bing Liu. 2004. Mining and summarizing customer reviews. In Won Kim, Ron Kohavi, Johannes Gehrke and William DuMouchel eds. Proceedings of the Tenth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. Washington: ACM, 168–177.
Hyland, Ken. 1996. Talking to the academy: Forms of hedging in science research articles. Written Communication 13/2: 251–281.
Hyland, Ken. 2005. Metadiscourse. London: Continuum.
Izutsu, Mitsuku Narita. 2008 Contrast, concessive, and corrective: Toward a comprehensive study of opposition relations. Journal of Pragmatics 40/4: 646–675.
Jonsson, Ewa. 2015. Conversational writing: A Multidimensional Study of Synchronous and Supersynchronous Computer-Mediated Communication. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Jordan, Michelle E., An-Chih Janne Cheng, Diane Schallert, Kwangok Song, SoonAh Lee and Yangjoo Park. 2014. “I guess my question is”: What is the co-occurrence of uncertainty and learning in computer-mediated discourse? International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 9: 451–475.
Li, Mimi. 2012. Politeness strategies in wiki-mediated communication of EFL collaborative writing tasks. The International Association for Language Learning Technology Journal 42/2: 1–26.
Locher; Miriam. 2004. Power and Politeness in Action: Disagreements in Oral Communication. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Locher, Miriam A. and Richard J. Watts. 2005. Politeness theory and relational work. Journal of Politeness Research 1: 9–33.
Locher, Miriam A. and Richard J. Watts. 2008. Relational work and impoliteness: Negotiating norms of linguistic behaviour. In Derek Bousfield and Miriam A. Locher eds. Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter, 77–99.
Mann, William C. and Sandra A. Thompson. 1988. Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization. Text – Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse 8/3: 243–281.
Monaco, Leida Maria. 2017. A Multidimensional Analysis of Late Modern English Scientific Texts from the Coruña Corpus. A Coruña: Universidade da Coruña dissertation.
Morand, David A. and Rosalie J. Ocker. 2003. Politeness theory and computer-mediated communication: A sociolinguistic approach to analysing relational messages. In Proceedings of the 36th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Hawaii: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2003.1173660
Musi, Elena, Debanjan Ghosh and Smaranda Muresan. 2018. ChangeMyView through concessions: Do concessions increase persuasion? Discourse and Dialogue 9/1: 1–21.
Park, Jung-ran. 2008. Linguistic politeness and face-work in computer mediated communication: An application of the theoretical framework. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59/14: 2199–2209.
Puschmann, Cornelius. 2010. Thank you for thinking we could: Use and function of interpersonal pronouns in corporate web logs. In Heidrun Dorgeloh and Anja Wanner eds. Syntactic Variation and Genre. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter, 167–191.
Pyo, Jihoon and Chung Hyun Lee. 2019. The effects of mitigation strategies instruction in peer response to L2 writing through computer-mediated communication at university level. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning 22/4: 103–133.
Savicki, Victor, Dawn Lingenfelter and Merle Kelley. 1996. Gender language style and group composition in Internet discussion groups. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 2/3, JCMC232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1996.tb00191.x
Schallert, Diane L., Yueh-hui Vanessa Chiang, Yangjoo Park, Michelle E. Jordan, Haekyung Lee, An-Chih Janne Cheng and Kwangok Song. 2009. Being polite while fulfilling different discourse functions in online classroom discussions. Computers and Education 53/3: 713–725.
Scott, Mike. 2016. WordSmith Tools Version 7. Stroud: Lexical Analysis Software.
SUNCODAC. 2021. Santiago University Corpus of Discussions in Academic Contexts. Santiago de Compostela: University of Santiago de Compostela. http://www.suncodac.com
Swanson, Reid, Brian Ecker and Marilyn A. Walker. 2015. Argument mining: Extracting arguments from online dialogue. In Svetlana Stoyancheve, Safiq Joty, David Schlangen, Ondrej Dusek, Casey Kennington and Malihe Alikhani eds. Proceedings of the 24th Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue. Prague: SIGDIAL, 217–226.
Taboada, Maite and María de los Ángeles Gómez-González. 2012. Discourse markers and coherence relations: Comparison across markers, languages and modalities. Linguistics and the Human Sciences 6/1-3: 17–41.
Tan, Chenhao, Vlad Niculae, Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil and Lillian Lee. 2016. Winning arguments: Interaction dynamics and persuasion strategies in good-faith online discussions. In Jaqueline Bordeau, Jim A. Hendler, Roger Nkambou, Ian Horrocks and Ben Y. Zhao eds. Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on World Wide Web. Quebec: International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, 613–624.
Tanskanen, Sanna-Kaisa and Johanna Karhukorpi. 2008. Concessive repair and negotiation of affiliation in e-mail discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 40/9: 1587–1600.
Tet Mei, Kirstie Fung, Su-Hie Ting and Kee-Man Chuah. 2023. Detecting female and male language features in Facebook comments by Malaysian millennial users. Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society 16/1: 37–55.
Thomson, Rob and Tamar Murachver. 2001. Predicting gender from electronic discourse. British Journal of Social Psychology 40/2: 193–208.
Uzelgun, Mehmet Ali, Dima Mohammed, Marcin Lewinski and Paula Castro. 2015. Managing disagreement through ‘yes, but’ constructions: An argumentative analysis. Discourse Studies 17/4: 467–484.
Van Nguyen, Long. 2010. Computer mediated collaborative learning within a communicative language teaching approach: A sociocultural perspective. The Asian EFL Journal Quarterly 12/1: 202–233.
Vinagre, Margarita. 2008. Politeness strategies in collaborative e-mail exchanges. Computers & Education 50/3: 1022–1036.
Watts, Richard. J. 1992. Linguistic politeness and politic verbal behaviour: Reconsidering claims for universality. In Richard J. Watts, Sachiko Ide and Konrad Ehlich eds. Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 43–69.
Watts, Richard. J. 2003. Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
West, Candace and Don H. Zimmerman.1987. Doing gender. Gender and Society 1: 125–51.
Yates, Simon J. 2001. Gender, language and CMC for education. Learning and Instruction 11/1: 21–34.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Research in Corpus Linguistics
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Submission of your paper to this journal implies that the paper is not under submission for publication elsewhere. Material which has been previously copyrighted, published, or accepted for publication will not be considered for publication in this journal. Submission of a manuscript is interpreted as a statement of certification that no part of the manuscript is copyrighted by any other publisher nor is under review by any other formal publication. By submitting your manuscript to us, you agree on these copyright guidelines. It is your responsibility to ensure that your manuscript does not cause any copyright infringements, defamation, and other problems.
Submitted papers are assumed to contain no proprietary material unprotected by patent or patent application; responsibility for technical content and for protection of proprietary material rests solely with the author(s) and their organizations and is not the responsibility of the journal or its editorial staff. The main author is responsible for ensuring that the article has been seen and approved by all the other authors. It is the responsibility of the author to obtain all necessary copyright release permissions for the use of any copyrighted materials in the manuscript prior to the submission.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under the BY Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
Article submission implies author agreement with this policy.
