Exploring noun lexical diversity and noun phrase complexity in Spanish email writing at B1 and C1 levels
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32714/ricl.13.02.01Keywords:
lexical diversity; NP complexity; learner email writing; CEFR B1; CEFR C1Abstract
Research on noun phrase use in EFL writing has mainly focused on linguistic complexity and accuracy, lexical richness, and phraseological competence. However, the relationship between noun lexical diversity of nouns and the syntactic complexity of the noun phrases in which these nouns appear remains underexplored. To address this gap, this paper examines the lexical diversity of head nouns in noun phrases within a sample of emails written by L1 Spanish EFL learners at B1 and C1 proficiency levels, taken from the FineDesc Learner Corpus. The analysis considers both the lexical diversity of nouns and the syntactic complexity of the noun phrases they head. The findings reveal: a) a narrower range of nouns at the B1 level compared to the C1 level; b) a low percentage of nouns from both levels, based on the English Vocabulary Profile; and c) differences in NP complexity between the two proficiency levels (B1 and C1), depending on whether the head nouns are concrete or abstract. The paper underscores the importance of combining different complexity measures ––namely, lexical diversity and NP complexity analyses–– to gain a more comprehensive understanding of learners’ use of noun phrases.
Downloads
References
Agirre, Eneko, Oier López de Lacalle and Aitor Soroa. 2018. The risk of sub-optimal use of Open-source NLP Software: UKB is inadvertently state-of-the-art in knowledge-based WSD. NLP-OSS workshop at ACL (arXiv:1805.04277). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W18-2505
Ai, Haiyang and Xiaofei Lu. 2013. A corpus-based comparison of syntactic complexity in NNS and NS university students’ writing. In Ana Díaz-Negrillo, Nicolas Ballier and Paul Thompson eds. Automatic Treatment and Analysis of Learner Corpus Data. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 249–264.
Allaw, Elissa. 2021. A learner corpus analysis: Effects of task complexity, task type, and L1 and L2 similarity on propositional and linguistic complexity. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 59/4: 569–604.
Ansarifar, Ahmad, Hesamoddin Shahriari and Reza Pishghadam. 2018. Phrasal complexity in academic writing: A comparison of abstracts written by graduate students and expert writers in applied linguistics. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 31: 58–71.
Bernardini, Petra and Jonas Granfeldt. 2019. On cross–linguistic variation and measures of linguistic complexity in learner texts: Italian, French and English. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 29/2: 211–232.
Biber, Douglas and Susan Conrad. 1999. Lexical bundles in conversation and academic prose. Language and Computers 26: 181–190.
Biber, Douglas and Bethany Gray. 2011. Grammatical change in the noun phrase: The influence of written language use. English Language and Linguistics 15/2: 223–250.
Biber, Douglas, Bethany Gray and Kornwipa Poonpon. 2011. Characteristics of conversation to measure complexity in L2 writing development. TESOL Quarterly 45/1: 5–35.
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey N. Leech, Susan Conrad and Edward Finegan. 2021. Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bulté, Bram and Alex Housen. 2012. Defining and operationalising L2 complexity. In Alex Housen, Folkert Kuiken and Ineke Vedder eds. Dimensions of L2 Performance and Proficiency: Investigating Complexity, Accuracy and Fluency in SLA. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 21-46.
Bulté, Bram and Alex Housen. 2014. Conceptualizing and measuring short-term changes in L2 writing complexity. Journal of Second Language Writing 26: 42–65.
Casal, J. Elliott and Joseph J. Lee. 2019. Syntactic complexity and writing quality in assessed first-year L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 44: 51–62.
Clavel-Arroitia, Begoña and Barry Pennock-Speck. 2021. Analysing lexical density, diversity, and sophistication in written and spoken telecollaborative exchanges. Computer Assisted Language Learning Electronic Journal 22/3: 230–250.
Council of Europe. 2001. The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Council of Europe. 2020. The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Companion Volume. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.
Crossley, Scott A., Kristopher Kyle and Danielle S. McNamara. 2016. The tool for the Automatic Analysis of Text Cohesion (TAACO): Automatic assessment of local, global, and text cohesion. Behavior research methods 48: 1227–1237.
Crossley, Scott A. and Danielle S. McNamara. 2014. Does writing development equal writing quality? A computational investigation of syntactic complexity in L2 learners. Journal of Second Language Writing 26: 66–79.
Crossley, Scott A., Tom Salsbury, Danielle S. McNamara and Scott Jarvis. 2011. Predicting lexical proficiency in language learner texts using computational indices. Language Testing 28/4: 561–580.
Díez-Bedmar, María Belén. 2015. Article use and criterial features in Spanish EFL writing. In Marcus Callies and Sandra Götz eds. Learner Corpora in Language Testing and Assessment. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 163–190.
Díez-Bedmar, María Belén and Pascual Pérez-Paredes. 2020. Noun phrase complexity in young Spanish EFL learners’ writing: Complementing syntactic complexity indices with corpus analyses. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 25/1: 1–33.
Du, Xiangtao, Muhammad Afzaal and Hind Al Fadda. 2022. Collocation Use in EFL Learners’ Writing Across Multiple Language Proficiencies: A Corpus-Driven Study. Frontiers in Psychology 13: 752134. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.752134
Ellis, Rod and Fangyuan Yuan. 2004. The effects of planning on fluency, complexity, and accuracy in second language narrative writing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 26: 59–84.
Engber, Cheryl A. 1995. The relationship of lexical proficiency to the quality of ESL compositions. Journal of Second Language Writing 4/2: 139–155.
Fellbaum, Christiane. 1998. WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Foster, Pauline, and Peter Skehan. 1996. The influence of planning and task type on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18: 299–324.
Foster, Pauline, Alan Tonkyn and Gill Wigglesworth. 2000. Measuring spoken language: A unit for all reasons. Applied Linguistics 21/3 : 354–375.
Gaillat, Thomas, Andre Simpkin, Nicolas Ballier, Bernardo Stearns, Annanda Sousa, Manon Bouyé and Manel Zarrouk. 2022. Predicting CEFR levels in learners of English: The use of microsystem criteria features in a machine learning approach. ReCALL 34/2: 130–146.
Gregori-Signes, Carmen and Begoña Clavel-Arroitia. 2015. Analysing lexical density and lexical diversity in university students’ written discourse. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 198: 546–556.
Housen, Alex, Els Schoonjans, Sonja Janssens, Aurélie Welcomme, Ellen Schoonheere and Michel Pierrard. 2011. Conceptualizing and measuring the impact of contextual factors in instructed SLA –– the role of language prominence. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 49/2: 83–112.
Howarth, Peter. 1998. The phraseology of learners’ academic writing. In Anthony P. Cowie ed. Phraseology: Theory, Analysis, and Applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 161–186.
Hunt, Kellogg W. 1965. Grammatical Structures Written at Three Grade Levels. National Council of Teachers of English Research Report No. 3. Champaign: Office of Education CTE Champaign.
Hyland, Ken. 2008. As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation. English for Specific Purposes 27: 4–21.
Ionin, Tania and María Belén Díez-Bedmar. 2021. Article use in Russian and Spanish learner writing at CEFR B1 and B2 Levels: Effects of proficiency, native language, and specificity. In Bert Le Bruyn and Magali Paquot eds. Learner Corpus Research Meets Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 10–38.
Khushik, Ghulam Abbas and Ari Huhta. 2020. Investigating syntactic complexity in EFL learners’ writing across Common European Framework of Reference levels A1, A2 and B1. Applied Linguistics 41/4: 506–532.
Kim, Jungyeon. 2021. Measuring NP complexity in Korean EFL writing across CEFR levels A2, B1 and B2. Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics 21: 341–358.
Kisselev, Olesya, Rossina Soyan, Dmitrii Pastushenkov and Jason Merrill. 2022. Measuring writing development and proficiency gains using indices of lexical and syntactic complexity: Evidence from longitudinal Russian learner corpus data. The Modern Language Journal 106/4: 798–817.
Kuiken, Folkert and Ineke Vedder. 2019. Syntactic complexity across proficiency and languages: L2 and L1 writing in Dutch, Italian and Spanish. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 29/2: 192–210.
Kuiken, Folkert, Ineke Vedder and Roger Gilabert. 2010. Communicative adequacy and linguistic complexity in L2 writing. In Inge Bartning, Maisa Martin and Ineke Uedder eds. Communicative, Proficiency and Linguistic Development: Intersections between SLA and Language Testing Research. Stockholm: European Second Language Association, 81–100.
Kyle, Kristopher. 2016. Measuring Syntactic Development in L2 Writing: Fine Grained Indices of Syntactic Complexity and Usage-based Indices of Syntactic Sophistication. Atlanta, GA: Georgia State University dissertation.
Kyle, Kristopher and Scott A. Crossley. 2015. Automatically assessing lexical sophistication: Indices, tools, findings, and application. TESOL Quarterly 49/4: 757–786.
Kyle, Kristopher and Scott A. Crossley. 2018. Measuring syntactic complexity in L2 writing using fine-grained clausal and phrasal indices. The Modern Language Journal 102/2: 339–349.
Lahmann, Cornelia, Rasmus Steinkrauss and Monika S. Schmid. 2019. Measuring linguistic complexity in long-term L2 speakers of English and L1 attriters of German. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 29: 173–191.
Lahuerta Martínez, Ana Cristina. 2018. Analysis of syntactic complexity in secondary education EFL writers at different proficiency levels. Assessing Writing 35: 1–11.
Lahuerta Martínez, Ana Cristina. 2023. Analysis of changes in L2 writing over the time of a short-term academic English programme. Porta Linguarum 39: 111–127.
Lahuerta Martínez, Ana Cristina. 2024. The role of syntactic and lexical complexity in undergraduate writing quality. Ibérica 47: 251–274.
Lambert, Craig and Sachiko Nakamura. 2019. Proficiency‐related variation in syntactic complexity: A study of English L1 and L2 oral descriptive discourse. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 29/2: 248–264.
Lan, Ge, Kyle Lucas and Yachao Sun. 2019. Does L2 writing proficiency influence noun phrase complexity? A case analysis of argumentative essay written by Chinese students in a first-year composition course. System 85: 1–13.
Lan, Ge, Qiusi Zhang, Kyle Lucas, Yachao Sun and Jie Gao. 2022. A corpus-based investigation on noun phrase complexity in L1 and L2 English writing. English for Specific Purposes 67: 4–17.
Liu, Liming and Lan Li. 2016. Noun phrase complexity in EFL academic writing: A corpus-based study of postgraduate academic writing. The Journal of Asia TEFL 13/1: 48–65.
Lu, Xiaofei. 2010. Automatic analysis of syntactic complexity in second language writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 15: 474–496.
Lu, Xiaofei. 2011. A corpus-based evaluation of syntactic complexity measures as indices of college-level ESL writers’ language development. TESOL Quarterly 45/1: 36–62.
Lu, Xiaofei. 2012. The relationship of lexical richness to the quality of ESL learners’ oral narratives. The Modern Language Journal 96/2: 190–208.
Lu, Xiaofei and Jifeng Wu. 2022. Noun-phrase complexity measures in Chinese and their relationship to L2 Chinese writing quality: A comparison with topic-comment-unit-based measures. The Modern Language Journal 106/1: 267–283.
Martínez Mimbrera, Francisco Javier. 2021. Tags Retrieval [Computer software]. Jaén: Universidad de Jaén.
Mazgutova, Diana and Judit Kormos. 2015. Syntactic and lexical development in an intensive English for Academic Purposes programme. Journal of Second Language Writing 29: 3–15.
Nation, Ian S. P. 2001. Learning Vocabulary in nother Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Norris, John M. and Lourdes Ortega. 2009. Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: The case of complexity. Applied Linguistics 30: 555–578.
North, Brian. 2021. The CEFR Companion Volume––What’s new and what might it imply for teaching/learning and for assessment? CEFR Journal: Research and Practice 4: 5–24.
Ong, Justina and Lawrence Jun Zhang. 2010. Effects of task complexity on the fluency and lexical complexity in EFL students’ argumentative writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 19/4: 218–233.
Ortega, Lourdes. 2003. Syntactic complexity measures and their relationship to L2 proficiency: A research synthesis of college-level L2 writing. Applied Linguistics 4/4: 492–518.
Padró, Lluís, Samuel Reese, Eneko Agirre and Aitor Soroa. 2010. Semantic services in FreeLing 2.1: WordNet and UKB. In Pushpak Bhattacharyya, Christiane D. Fellbaum and Piek Vossen eds. Principles, Construction, and Application of Multilingual Wordnets. Mumbai: Narosa Publishing House, 99–105.
Padró, Lluís and Evgeny Stanilovsky. 2012. FreeLing 3.0: Towards wider multilinguality. In Nicoletta Calzolari, Khalid Choukri, Thierry Declerk, Mehmet Ugur Dogan, Bente Maegaard, Joseph Mariani, Asunción Moreno, Jan Odijk and Stelios Peiperidis eds. Proceedings of the 8th the Language Resources and Evaluation Conference. Istanbul: European Language Research Asociation, 2473–2479.
Paquot, Magali. 2019. The phraseological dimension in interlanguage complexity research. Second Language Research 35/1: 121–145.
Parkinson, Jean and Jill Musgrave. 2014. Development of noun phrase complexity in the writing of English for Academic Purposes students. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 14: 48–59.
Peters, Elke. 2016. The learning burden of collocations: The role of interlexical and intralexical factors. Language Teaching Research 20: 113–138.
Polat, Brittany and Youjin Kim. 2014. Dynamics of complexity and accuracy: A longitudinal case study of advanced untutored development. Applied Linguistics 35/2: 184–207.
Polio, Charlene and Ji-Hyun Park. 2016. Language development in second language writing. In Rosa María Manchón and Paul Kei Matsuda eds. Handbook of Second Language Writing. New York: Routledge, 287–306.
Qin, Wenjuan and Paola Uccelli. 2020. Beyond linguistic complexity: Assessing register flexibility in EFL writing across contexts. Assessing Writing 45: 100465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2020.100465
Ravid, Dorit and Ruth A. Berman. 2010. Developing noun phrase complexity at school age: A text-embedded cross-linguistic analysis. First Language 30/1: 3-26.
Sarte, Kayla Marie and Ksenia Gnevsheva. 2022. Noun phrasal complexity in ESL written essays under a constructed-response task: Examining proficiency and topic effects. Assessing Writing 51: 100595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2021.100595
Šišková, Zdislava. 2012. Lexical richness in EFL students’ narratives. Language Studies Working Papers 4: 26–36.
Skehan, Peter. 1989. Individual differences in Second Language Learning. London: Hoder Arnold.
Staples, Shelly and Randi Reppen. 2016. Understanding first-year L2 writing: A lexico-grammatical analysis across L1s, genres, and language ratings. Journal of Second Language Writing 32: 17–35.
Staples, Shelley, Jesse Egbert, Douglas Biber and Bethany Gray. 2016. Academic writing development at university level: Phrasal and clausal complexity across level of study, discipline and genre. Written Communication 33/2: 149–183.
Su, Yanfang, Kanglong Liu, Fengkai Liu, John Lee and Tan Jin. 2023. Lexical complexity in exemplar EFL texts: Towards text adaptation for 12 grades of basic English curriculum in China. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 62/1: 137–164.
Treffers-Daller, Jeanine, Patrick Parslow and Shirley Williams. 2018. Back to basics: How measures of lexical diversity can help discriminate between CEFR levels. Applied Linguistics 39/3: 302–327.
Vedder, Ineke and Veronica Benigno. 2016. Lexical richness and collocational competence in second-language writing. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 54/1: 23–42.
Vidal, Karina and Scott Jarvis. 2020. Effects of English-medium instruction on Spanish students’ proficiency and lexical diversity in English. Language Teaching Research 24/5: 568–587.
Vyatkina, Nina. 2013. Specific syntactic complexity: Developmental profiling of individuals based on an annotated learner corpus. The Modern Language Journal 97/S1: 11–30.
Wolfe-Quintero, Kathryn Elizabeth, Shunji Inagaki and Hae-Young Kim. 1998. Second Language Development in Writing: Measures of Fluency, Accuracy and Complexity. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i at Manoa.
Xu, Lirong. 2019. Noun phrase complexity in integrated writing produced by advanced Chinese EFL learners. Papers in Language Testing and Assessment 8/1: 31–51.
Yoon, Hyung-Jo. 2017. Linguistic complexity in L2 writing revisited: Issues of topic, proficiency, and construct multidimensionality. System 66: 130–141.
Zhang, Xiaopeng and Xiaofei Lu. 2022. Revisiting the predictive power of traditional vs. fine-grained syntactic complexity indices for L2 writing quality: The case of two genres. Assessing Writing 51: 100597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2021.100597
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Research in Corpus Linguistics

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Submission of your paper to this journal implies that the paper is not under submission for publication elsewhere. Material which has been previously copyrighted, published, or accepted for publication will not be considered for publication in this journal. Submission of a manuscript is interpreted as a statement of certification that no part of the manuscript is copyrighted by any other publisher nor is under review by any other formal publication. By submitting your manuscript to us, you agree on these copyright guidelines. It is your responsibility to ensure that your manuscript does not cause any copyright infringements, defamation, and other problems.
Submitted papers are assumed to contain no proprietary material unprotected by patent or patent application; responsibility for technical content and for protection of proprietary material rests solely with the author(s) and their organizations and is not the responsibility of the journal or its editorial staff. The main author is responsible for ensuring that the article has been seen and approved by all the other authors. It is the responsibility of the author to obtain all necessary copyright release permissions for the use of any copyrighted materials in the manuscript prior to the submission.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under the BY Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
Article submission implies author agreement with this policy.