Evidentiality across age and gender: A corpus-based study of variation in spoken British English
Abstract
Abstract – This paper investigates the effects of age and gender on the frequency of the evidentiality categories ‘sensory’, ‘hearsay’ and ‘inferential’ in spontaneous spoken British English. The findings from the main data sample from the British National Corpus (BNC) are also compared to patterns in a smaller data set from the Diachronic Corpus of Present-day Spoken English (DCPSE) in order to estimate the relative effects of age-grading versus historical change. The results confirm statistically significant differences between men and women in their use of evidentiality, but show no significant effect of age or the interaction of age and gender. The comparison of the findings from the BNC data and the DCPSE data suggests that age-related patterns in evidentiality use are more diachronically stable than gender-related patterns.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2007. Information source and evidentiality: what can we conclude? Rivista di Linguistica 19/1: 209–227.
Alonso-Almeida, Francisco and Laura Cruz-García. 2011. The value of may as an evidential and epistemic marker in English medical abstracts. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 46/3: 59–73.
Alonso-Almeida, Francisco and Ma Isabel González-Cruz. 2012. Exploring male and female voices through epistemic modality and evidentiality in some Modern English travel texts on the Canaries. Research in Language 10/3: 323–343.
Ansara, Y. Gavriel and Peter Hegarty. 2014. Methodologies of misgendering: recommendations for reducing cisgenderism in psychological research. Feminism and Psychology 24/2: 259–270.
Barbieri, Federica. 2007. Older men and younger women: a corpus-based study of quotative use in American English. English World-Wide 28/1: 23−45.
Barbieri, Federica. 2008. Patterns of age-based linguistic variation in American English. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12/1: 58–88.
Bednarek, Monika. 2006. Epistemological positioning and evidentiality in English news discourse: a text-driven approach. Text and Talk 26/6: 635–660.
Berglind Söderqvist, Erika. 2017. Gender differences and similarities in the use of inferential evidentiality markers in spoken British English: a corpus-based study. In Juana I. Marín-Arrese, Julia Lavid-López, Marta Carretero, Elena Domínguez Romero, Mª Victoria Martín de la Rosa and María Pérez Blanco eds. Evidentiality and modality in European languages: discourse-pragmatic perspectives. Bern: Peter Lang, 371–399.
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad and Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.
Brezina, Vaclav. 2013. BNC64. http://corpora.lancs.ac.uk/bnc64/. Data used in the BNC64 Search & Compare tool have been extracted from the British National Corpus, distributed by Oxford University Computing Services on behalf of the BNC Consortium. Used with permission. (3 November 2016)
The British National Corpus, version 3 (BNC XML Edition). 2007. Distributed by Oxford University Computing Services on behalf of the BNC Consortium. http://www.natcorp.ox.ac.uk.
Canary, Daniel J. and Kimberley S. Hause 1993. Is there any reason to research sex differences in communication? Communication Quarterly 41/2: 129–144.
Cappelli, Gloria. 2007. ‘I reckon I know how Leonardo da Vinci must have felt…’: Epistemicity, evidentiality and English verbs of cognitive attitude. Pari: Pari Publishing.
Carretero, Marta and Juan Rafael Zamorano-Mansilla. 2014. Annotating English adverbials for the categories of epistemic modality and evidentiality. In Juana I. Marrín-Arrese, Marta Carretero and Jorge Arús Hita eds. English modality: core, periphery and evidentiality. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 317–355.
Carretero, Marta and Juan Rafael Zamorano-Mansilla. 2015. Evidentiality as conversational implicature: implications for corpus annotation. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 212: 146–150.
Cornillie, Bert. 2009. Evidentiality and epistemic modality: on the close relationship between two different categories. Functions of Language 16/1: 44–62.
de Haan, Ferdinand. 2001a. The relation between modality and evidentiality. Linguistische Berichte 9: 201–216.
de Haan, Ferdinand. 2001b. The place of inference within the evidential system. International Journal of American Linguistics 67/2: 193–219.
The Diachronic Corpus of Present-Day Spoken English (DCPSE). Distributed by the Survey of English Usage, University College London. http://www.ucl.ac.uk/english-usage/projects/dcpse.
Eckert, Penelope. 1997. Age as a sociolinguistic variable. In Florian Coulmas ed. The handbook of sociolinguistics. Oxford: Blackwell, 151–167.
Eckert, Penelope and Sally McConnell-Ginet. 2013. Language and gender, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Grob, Lindsey M., Renee A. Meyers and Renee Schuh. 1997. Powerful/powerless language use in group interactions: sex differences or similarities? Communication Quarterly 45/3: 282–303.
Holmes, Janet. 1990. Hedges and boosters in women’s and men’s speech. Language and Communication 10/3: 185–205.
Kasen, Stephanie, Henian Chen, Joel Sneed, Thomas Crawford and Patricia Cohen. 2006. Social role and birth cohort influences on gender-linked personality traits in women: a 20-year longitudinal analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 91/5: 944–958.
Lakoff, Robin. 1973. Language and woman’s place. Language in Society 2/1: 45–80.
Lindsey, Linda L. 2016. Gender roles: a sociological perspective, 6th ed. London: Routledge.
MacDonald, Eleanor. 1998. Critical identities: rethinking feminism through transgender politics. Atlantis 23/1: 3–12.
Mann, Robin. 2007. Out of the shadows?: grandfatherhood, age, and masculinities. Journal of Aging Studies 21/4: 281–291.
Mulac, Anthony, John M. Wiemann, Sally J. Widenmann and Toni W. Gibson. 1988. Male/female language differences and effects in same-sex and mixed-sex dyads: the gender-linked language effect. Communication Monographs 55: 315–335.
Murphy, Bróna. 2010. Corpus and sociolinguistics: investigating age and gender in female talk. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Nelson, Gerald, Sean Wallis and Bas Aarts. 2006. The International Corpus of English: the British Component (Release 2): The Diachronic Corpus of Present-Day Spoken English. Getting Started with ICECUP 3.1. London: Survey of English Usage, University College London.
Paunonen, Heikki. 1994. Language change in apparent time and in real time. Paper delivered at the 23rd Annual Conference on New Ways of Analyzing Variation, Stanford CA.
Plungian, Vladimir A. 2001. The place of evidentiality within the universal grammatical space. Journal of Pragmatics 33: 349–357.
Precht, Kristen. 2008. Sex similarities and differences in stance in informal American conversation. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12/1: 89–111.
Whitt, Richard J. 2009. Auditory evidentiality in English and German: the case of perception verbs. Lingua 119/7: 1083–1095.
Willett, Thomas. 1988. A cross-linguistic survey of the grammaticization of evidentiality. Studies in Language 12/1: 51–97.
Zhang, Grace. 2014. The elasticity of I think: stretching its pragmatic functions. Intercultural Pragmatics 11/2: 225–257.
