The metadiscourse of Arabic academic abstracts: A corpus-based study
Abstract
Research on metadiscourse and rhetorical features in modern Arabic academic writing is scarce both in quantity and in scope. Abstracts, in particular, are a severely understudied academic register. This study aims to fill a gap in the study of academic abstracts in Arabic by providing a more comprehensive analysis of metadiscourse in Arabic academic abstracts. The data for the study includes a corpus of 400 Arabic abstracts, which have been labeled according to two variables: (a) abstract type (journal or dissertation); and (b) author gender (male, female, mixed gender). The analysis follows the theoretical framework proposed by Hyland (2019), as the data has been annotated for both textual metadiscourse (transition markers, frame markers, evidentials, endophorics and code glosses) and interpersonal metadiscourse (hedges, boosters, attitude markers, engagement markers and self-mentions). Results show that Arabic academic abstracts are rich in both types of metadiscourse features. Transition and frame markers have the highest frequency in the textual domain, while boosters and self-mentions are highly frequent in the interpersonal domain. Endophoric markers and hedges are the least used types of metadiscourse in the data, but engagement markers are surprisingly more frequent than previously thought.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Al-Ghoweri, Helen A. and Murad M. Al Kayed. 2019. A comparative study of hedges and boosters in English and Jordanian Arabic: Economic newspaper articles as a case study. Theory and Practice in Language Studies 9/1: 52–59.
Al-Gublan, Badriah. 2013. Hedging strategies in English and Arabic scientific written discourse. Arab Journal for the Humanities 31/124: 183–208.
Alharbi, Lafi M. and John Swales. 2011. Arabic and English abstracts in bilingual language science journals: Same or different? Languages in Contrast 11/1: 70–86.
Alhumidi, Hamed and Sani Uba. 2016. College students’ use of metadiscourse across two languages: A case of college students at the College of Basic Education, Kuwait. International Journal of English Language Teaching 4/9: 14–29.
Alhuqbani, Mohammed Nasser. 2013. Genre-based analysis of Arabic research article abstracts across four disciplines. Journal of Educational and Social Research 3/3: 371–382.
Alotaibi, Hmoud. 2015. Metadiscourse in Arabic and English research article abstracts. World Journal of English Language 5/2: 1–8.
Al-Qahtani, Abdulkhaleq. 2006. A Contrastive Rhetoric Study of Arabic and English Research Article Introductions. Oklahoma: Oklahoma State University dissertation.
Alqahtani, Sahar and Safaa Abdelhalim. 2020. Gender-based study of interactive metadiscourse markers in EFL academic writing. Theory and Practice in Language Studies 10/10: 1315–1325.
Al-Shahrani, Saad. 2010. Al-kitāba Al-akādimiyya: Xaṣā’iṣuha wa mutaṭallabātuha al-luġawiyya (Academic writing: Its characteristics and linguistic requirements). https://educationalresearchers.files.wordpress.com/2018/12/d8a7d984d983d8aad8a7d8a8d8a9-d8a7d984d8a3d983d8a7d8afd98ad985d98ad8a9-d8aed8b5d8a7d8a6d8b5d987d8a7-d988d985d8aad8b7d984d8a8d8a7d8aa.pdf (5 August, 2021.)
Al-Sharif, Abdullah. 1996. Manāhij Al-baḥṯ Al-Ɂilmiyy: Dalīl aṭ-ṭālib fī kitābat al-abḥāṯ al-Ɂilmiyya (Methodologies of Scientific Research: The Student’s Guide to Writing Scientific Research). Alexandria: Maktabat Al-’išɁāɁ Publisher.
Al-Shujairi, Yasir. 2020. What, which and where: Examining self-mention markers in ISI and Iraqi local research articles in applied linguistics. Asian Englishes 22/1: 20–34.
Alzarieni, Mahmoud, Manal Intan Safinaz Zainudin, Norsimah Mat Awal and Mohamed Zain Sulaiman. 2019. Interactional metadiscourse markers in the abstract Sections of Arabic patents. Arab World English Journal 10/2: 379–393.
Ayers, Gael. 2008. The evolutionary nature of genre: An investigation of the short texts accompanying research articles in the scientific journal Nature. English for Specific Purposes 27/1: 22–41.
Baratta, Alexander M. 2009. Revealing stance through passive voice. Journal of Pragmatics 41/7: 1406–1421.
Belcher, Wendy Laura. 2009. Writing your Journal Article in 12 Weeks: A Guide to Academic Publishing Success. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications
Bouziane, Abdelmajid and Fatima Ezzahra Metkal. 2020. Differences in research abstracts written in Arabic, French, and English. English Studies at NBU 6/2: 233–248.
Briones, Roy Randy. 2018. Move analysis of abstracts in applied linguistics research: The Middle East and North Africa (MENA) perspective. Asian Journal of English Language Studies 6: 25–55.
Crismore, Avon. 1989. Talking with Readers: Metadiscourse as Rhetorical Act. Bern: Peter Lang.
Dahl, Trine. 2004a. Some characteristics of argumentative abstracts. Akademisk Prosa 2: 49–69.
Dahl, Trine. 2004b. Textual metadiscourse in research articles: A marker of national culture or of academic discipline? Journal of Pragmatics 36/10: 1807–1825.
D’angelo, Larissa. 2008. Gender identity and authority in academic book reviews: An analysis of metadiscourse across disciplines. Linguistica e Filologia 27: 205–221.
El-Seidi, Mohamed. 2000. Metadiscourse in English and Arabic argumentative writing: A cross-linguistic study of texts written. In Zaynab Ibrahim, Sabiha Aydelott and Nagwa Kassabgy eds. Diversity in Language: Contrastive Studies in Arabic and English Theoretical and Applied Linguistics. Cairo: AUC Press, 111–126.
Fallatah, Wafaa. 2016. Features of Saudi English research articles abstracts. Arab World English Journal 7/2: 368–379.
Fischer, Beth A. and Michael J. Zigmond. 2004. Components of a research article. http://sites.psu.edu/bee11/wp-content/uploads/sites/16010/2011/03/Components-of-a-Research-Article.pdf (5 August, 2021.)
Gillaerts, Paul and Freek van de Velde. 2010. Interactional metadiscourse in research article abstracts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 9/2: 128–139.
Halliday, Michael A. K. 1977. Explorations in the Functions of Language. London: Edwards Arnold.
Hassan, Ahmad. 1996. Usūl al-Baḥṯ al-Ɂilmiyy. (Principles of Scientific Research) Parts I and II. Cairo: Al-Maktaba Al-Akādīmiyya.
Huckin, Thomas. 2006. Abstracting from abstracts. In Martin Hewings ed. Academic Writing in Context: Implications and Applications. London: Bloomsbury Publishing, 93–103.
Hyland, Ken. 1998. Persuasion and context: The pragmatics of academic metadiscourse. Journal of Pragmatics 30/4: 437–455.
Hyland, Ken. 1999. Talking to students: Metadiscourse in introductory coursebooks. English for Specific Purposes 18/1: 3–26.
Hyland, Ken. 2000. Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. London: Longman.
Hyland, Ken. 2004a. Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Hyland, Ken. 2004b. Disciplinary interactions: Metadiscourse in L2 postgraduate writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 13/2: 133–151.
Hyland, Ken. 2014. Engagement and disciplinarity: The other side of evaluation. In Gabriella Camiciotti Del Lungo and Elena Tognini Bonelli eds. Academic Discourse: New Insights into Evaluation. Bern: Peter Lang, 13–30.
Hyland, Ken. 2019. Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. London: Bloomsbury.
Hyland, Ken and Polly Tse. 2004. Metadiscourse in academic writing: A reappraisal. Applied Linguistics 25/2: 156–177.
Ivanič, Roz. 1998. Writing and Identity: The Discoursal Construction of Identity in Academic Writing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Jin, Xin and Yan Shang. 2016. Analyzing metadiscourse in the English abstracts of BA theses. Journal of Language Teaching and Research 7/1: 210–215.
Khedri, Mohsen. 2018. Evidentials in research articles: A marker of discipline. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities 26: 145–158.
Kopple, William J. Vande. 1985. Some exploratory discourse on metadiscourse. College Composition and Communication 36/1: 82–93.
Larcher, Pierre and Alain Girod. 1990. Passif grammatical, passif periphrastique et categorie d’auxiliaire en Arabe classique moderne. Arabica 37/2: 137–150.
Lorés, Rosa. 2004. On RA Abstracts: From rhetorical structure to thematic organisation. English for Specific Purposes 23/3: 280–302.
Mansouri, Aous. 2016. Stative and Stativizing Constructions in Arabic News Reports: A Corpus-based Study. Boulder: University of Colorado dissertation.
Miech, Edward J., Bill Nave and Frederick Mosteller. 2005. The 20,000 article problem: How a structured abstract can help practitioners sort out educational research. Phi Delta Kappan 86/5: 396–400.
Najjar, Hazem. 1990. Arabic as a Research Language: The Case of the Agricultural Sciences. Michigan: University of Michigan dissertation.
Nugroho, Ardi. 2019. Exploring metadiscourse use in thesis abstracts: A cross-cultural study. Journal of English Language and Culture 9/2: 113–127.
Ozdemir, Neslihan Onder and Bernadette Longo. 2014. Metadiscourse use in thesis abstracts: A cross-cultural study. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 141: 59–63.
Pasaribu, Truly. 2017. Gender differences and the use of metadiscourse markers in writing essays. International Journal of Humanity Studies 1/1: 93–102.
Rainer, Simon, Elton Barker, Leif Isaksen, Pau de Soto, Valeria Vitale and Rebecca Kahn. 2016. Recogito. Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH. https://recogito.pelagios.org/
Robson, Jocelyn, Becky Francis and Barbara Read. 2002. Writes of passage: Stylistic features of male and female undergraduate history essays. Journal of Further and Higher Education 26/4: 351–362.
Ryding, Karin C. 2005. A Reference Grammar of Modern Standard Arabic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Serholt, Sofia. 2012. Hedges and Boosters in Academic Writing – A Study of Gender Differences in Essays Written by Swedish Advanced Learners of English. Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg BA dissertation. http://hdl.handle.net/2077/29526
Stotesbury, Hilkka. 2003. Evaluation in research article abstracts in the narrative and hard sciences. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2/4: 327–341.
Sultan, Abbas. 2011. A contrastive study of metadiscourse in English and Arabic linguistics research articles. Acta Linguistica 5/1: 28–41.
Swales, John. 1990. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Swales, John and Christine B. Feak. 2004. Commentary for Academic Writing for Graduate Students: Essential Tasks and Skills. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Thomas, Sarah and Thomas P. Hawes. 1994. Reporting verbs in medical journal articles. English for Specific Purposes 13/2: 129–148.
Thompson, Geoff and Puleng Thetela. 1995. The sound of one hand clapping: The management of interaction in written discourse. Text – Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse 15/1: 103–127.
Tse, Polly and Ken Hyland. 2008. Robot Kung fu: Gender and professional identity in biology and philosophy reviews. Journal of Pragmatics 40: 1232–1248.
Ventola, Eija. 1994. Abstracts as an object of linguistic study. In Světla Čmejrková, František Daneš and Eva Havlová eds. Writing vs. Speaking: Language, Text, Discourse, Communication. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag, 333–335.
Yeganeh, Maryam Tafaroji and Seyedeh Marzieh Ghoreyshi. 2015. Exploring gender differences in the use of discourse markers in Iranian academic research articles. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Science 192: 684–689.
Young, Petey. 2006. Writing and Presenting in English: The Rosetta Stone of Science. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Copyright (c) 2022 Research in Corpus Linguistics
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
